HomeThe FirmOur PracticeAttorneysOffice LocationVictoriesResource LinksContact Us

FindLaw News

News

Drugs and Biotech

[07/08] Novartis closer to $38B Alcon takeover
[07/08] FDA calls for urgent warning on tendon risks
[07/07] Fresenius paying $3.7B for US drugmaker APP

More...

Personal Injury

[07/08] Truck rams Concorde, knocks off its nose in NYC
[06/11] Man feels fine after being shot in head by nailgun
[06/24] Brain injuries cause half of seniors' fall deaths

More...

Product Liability

[07/08] FDA issues warning on Cipro, similar antibiotics
[07/07] Cholesterol drugs recommended for some 8-year-olds
[06/25] US panel endorses 2nd vaccine for kids' virus

More...

Top Headlines

[07/08] Obama proposes bankruptcy changes
[07/08] Fed to curb shady home-lending practices
[07/08] Legal claim filed over death at NYC psych ward

More...

Case Summaries

Elder Law

[06/30] Sanders v. Lawson
The attorney's fees provision of the Elder Abuse Act does not authorize the award of trustee fees as costs.

[05/13] Cao v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
In an action wherein plaintiff sought recovery under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 for alleged constitutional violations along with several state law causes of action after she was removed from her home, made to undergo a psychological evaluation, and placed in a state institution for the elderly, dismissal of plaintiff's complaint is affirmed where: 1) the district court properly dismissed plaintiff's section 1983 claim as untimely; and 2) with no federal cause of action remaining, the district court acted within its discretion in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over remaining state law claims.

[05/05] Miller v. Am. Airlines, Inc.
In a suit against American Airlines under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) a collective bargaining agreement did not require that plaintiffs be offered positions of comparable pay past the retirement age; 2) a claim, that a supplement to the collective bargaining agreement governing the retirement of flight engineers was facially discriminatory, was not properly raised before the EEOC.

More...